2022 - Questions and Results

Kentucky identified at least one performance measure for each of the six core systems. There were two processes in which these performance measures were identified. Some of the systems chose to utilize the NHTSA advisory document to create a survey of their respective systems. This determined the capacity and qualities of each system and helped officials identify needed improvements for performance measures. A couple of the systems opted to identify needs and improvement opportunities through email and numerous discussions. In the strategic plan, each system has a table with the identified performance measures, attributes, baseline, goal, and deliverable date. The table provides a tool for tracking and monitoring by the TRCC. A project was funded to track the performance measures. It was noted in the narrative that the report was shared annually with the data system custodian and discussed in TRCC meetings. Meeting minutes or an annual report were not provided, so it is unclear what this monitoring report looked like.

Rating Improved.
From ‘Does Not Meet Advisory Ideal’ to ‘Partially Meets Advisory Ideal’.