The I-65/I-71 Regional Connector Planning Study is a high
level study to determine project need, project goals, and project
feasibility/cost of a corridor from I-65 in Bullitt County connecting to I-71
in Oldham or Henry County. Funding for
this study was included in the 2018 Highway Plan by the Kentucky legislature.
Early in 2019, the project team began collecting data
on existing conditions for use in determining existing: traffic volumes, land
use, traffic patterns, crash history, environmental issues, and other relevant
data. Five regional focus groups were
formed with representation from elected officials, economic
development, city and county planning, zoning, & engineering, parks,
chambers of commerce, etc. for the counties of Bullitt, Nelson, Shelby, Spencer,
Jefferson, Oldham and Henry. There is also a focus group for state and federal
agencies. The first round of meetings with these groups was held in late
January 2019 to review the data collected on existing conditions. These groups provided input to help the team
understand the land use and development in their counties. The group members
gave input that helped develop the purpose and need statements. They also were
given the opportunity to draw lines of potential alignments on a blank map of
the study area.
The project team developed fifteen preliminary alignment
alternatives (twelve new and three along existing routes) based on the existing
conditions, environmental considerations and input from the first round of
focus groups. The second round of focus group meetings were held in late
May/early June 2019 where the project team presented these alternatives and gathered
input. The handouts provided at those meetings can be found at the right under Supporting Documents.
It is important to remember that these are wide,
potential corridors, not specific roadway alignments. The corridros are shown at a width
of 2500 feet. If a project were to move forward, a roadway alignment would be
narrowed down to approximately 200-250 feet. At this point in the study, detailed
potential impacts from each corridor are not known.
The project team will take the input from the second
round of focus group meetings and screen the alternatives to determine which
ones best meet the overall goals and objectives listed on the handout. The
performance measures being used include mobility, land use and development,
safety, environmental, and cost. The screening process will yield 3 to 5
corridor alternates, including “no build.” The team will study that selected
range of alternatives in greater detail during summer 2019.
The final report from this study is due by the end of 2019. It will contain a summary of study data, analyses and recommended
alternative(s) that can be used by the legislature if they want to fund a
highway project in the future. If a
project or projects advances forward from the study, there will be ample
opportunity for public participation and comment.
If you have any further questions or comments, please
contact our project engineer, Susan Oatman, via email at firstname.lastname@example.org .