12-1018 | 310 | Menifee | The erosion control plan seems to be a normal KYTC plan. What are the special conditions of the erosion control plan? |
Enhanced BMPs at Outfalls #8A, #8B, #8C, #8D, #17, #18, and #19.
| 5/30/2012 9:36 AM |
12-1018 | 310 | Menifee | Note T-3 also states “All work performed under this certification shall also adhere to the design and specifications set forth in the Gladie Basin Supplemental Information …” Where is this information? What are the requirements that apply to the contractor that are within these documents? |
An addendum including this information will be posted to the website.
| 5/30/2012 9:36 AM |
12-1018 | 310 | Menifee | Are there other specific conditions of the Water Quality Certification that restrict the contractor? |
The specific conditions are listed in the Water Quality Certification included in the proposal.
| 5/30/2012 9:36 AM |
12-1018 | 310 | Menifee | Note T-5 states “No in-stream work or disturbance shall be conducted or in place within the Mariba Fork of Gladie Creek watershed … during fish spawning season (APRIL 15th through JUNE 15th).” Can KYTC clearly identify what portions of the project this restricts? |
Please see condition No. T-2 on page 48 of the proposal. This lists the portions of the project that are restricted from April 15th - June 15th.
| 5/30/2012 9:36 AM |
12-1328 | 305 | Hardin | Is there any Geotechnical Information for this project? |
No, a geotechnical investigation was not performed for this project.
| 6/1/2012 3:13 PM |
12-1018 | 310 | Menifee | The Water Quality Certification has conditions on pages 47-50 of the proposal. Many of these appear to either be informational or the responsibility of KYTC. Note T-3 states “All work performed under this certification shall adhere to the design and specifications set forth in the Water Quality Certification Application submitted to the KDOW on January 11, 2012.” Where is this information? |
The information is on proposal pages 39-44.
| 5/30/2012 9:36 AM |
12-1328 | 305 | Hardin | There is 111 lf of 30” storm to bore and jack at Sta 200+98 on Ring Road (plan sheet R179). Should there be a bid item for this? |
Yes. An addendum will be posted to the website.
| 6/7/2012 1:46 PM |
12-1009 | 300 | Knox | Who will be providing the foundation and wing wall drawings? |
The contractor is responsible as per sheet R8.
| 6/7/2012 1:45 PM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Concerning bid item line no. 0590, Steel Strain Pole, is this an electrical signal bid item? |
Please see plan sheet R15 and signing plan sheet T20 for details of bid item line no. 0590, Steel Strain Pole.
| 6/6/2012 9:32 AM |
12-1018 | 310 | Menifee | Page 22 of the proposal: “Special Note Concerning Biological Assessment and Begin work on Project” states “KYTC has committed to hold the award until November 15, 2012.” If tree cutting is allowed on November 15, 2012, can the note be changed to award the job earlier so that preconstruction activities and erosion control work can be completed prior to the November 15, 2012 tree cutting date? |
Yes, an addendum revising the date in the note will be posted to the website.
| 5/30/2012 9:36 AM |
12-1018 | 310 | Menifee | What are the special conditions of the KPDES permit application that apply to the contractor? |
An addendum including this information will be posted to the website.
| 5/30/2012 9:36 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Concerning item 24133EC "Install Wireless Sensor System". Being that this is a relatively new item, could you provide detail for installation procedure as well as manufacturer and model of this item? |
The installation procedure is the responsibility of the contractor per the bid item. The manufacturer of the KYTC-supplied material is SENSYS. The Product help can be from the manufacturer or ( Baldwin and Sours phone: 614-851-8800 ).
| 6/7/2012 1:47 PM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN - PHASE 1, SHEET R58, KY 1747 Lane Closures are only permitted between the hours of 9 pm to 6 am. It is noted that a disincentive amount of $100,000 per hour shall be assessed in quarter hour intervals for any time after the 6 am that all lanes are not open to traffic. The amount of the disincentive is substantial. Is this dollar amount correct? |
The disincentive amount will be revised. An addendum will be posted to the website.
| 6/8/2012 11:07 AM |
12-1234 | 104 | Various | In the Material, Installation, and Bid Item Notes for Permanent Traffic Data Acquisition Stations portion of the proposal; section 2.15.3, 3.11 and 4.8 refer to Junction Box 10x8x4. Where are these Junction boxes used? |
The junction boxes 10”X8”X4” will not be used on the project. There is not a bid item for this.
| 6/11/2012 2:09 PM |
12-1234 | 104 | Various | Are all service drops limited to 35 Ft Wooden Pole the service & control cabinet is on? (Meaning- there is no long runs and or extension to bring power feeders to this 35 Ft Wooden Pole?) |
All drops are straight to the pole that the service is on.
| 6/11/2012 11:30 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | The specifications call for 2” Air Release Valves and the detail shows 4”. Please confirm the size. |
The plans call for the installation of (2) - 2-inch Air Release Valves and that is the correct size.
| 6/11/2012 2:22 PM |
12-1234 | 104 | Various | With having to clear for utilities drops as stated in proposal, would this call for a bid item, “CLEAR & GRUBBING”? |
No, clearing of R/W for the electrical service drop is incidental to the item “Install Electrical Service.”
| 6/11/2012 11:30 AM |
12-1234 | 104 | Various | On page 5 of 304 Proposal, it says “ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT 00”. What District be handling administration for this project? |
Katy Renfroe in District 5 will be overseeing the contract.
| 6/11/2012 11:30 AM |
12-1234 | 104 | Various | These questions are for Line 0140 Item 04899 Electrical Service 20 each and Line 0150 04901 Telephone Service 20 each. In the Material, Installation, and Bid Item Notes for Permanent Traffic Data Acquisition Stations portion of the proposal; section 3.5 Electrical Service paragraph 3 it indicates that “Contractor shall obtain electrical inspections, memberships, meter base, service disconnect and any other requirements by the utility serving the installation and pay all fees as required.” section 4.3 Electrical Service indicates that “Electrical Service shall include furnishing and installing all necessary materials and payment of all fees toward the complete installation of an electrical service which has passed all required inspections.” section 4.16 Telephone Service indicates that “Telephone Services shall include furnishing and installing all necessary materials and payment of all fees toward the complete installation of a telephone service, which has passed all required inspections.” Are the charges from the individual utility companies for their portions of work billed to and paid for by the state or are these charges included under the umbrella of “fees” as mentioned in the above paragraph? If these charges are included as “fees” does the state have a listing of the individual utilities and contacts for each of the locations so that contractors can contact them for the cost of their services? |
As stated in the question, the contractor is required to cover “payment of all fees toward the complete installation of an electrical service.” This would include any charges from the individual utility companies. Other than what’s included in the Utility Impact notes in the proposal, this office does not have a listing of the utilities and contacts for each location.
| 6/11/2012 11:30 AM |
12-1018 | 310 | Menifee | After reviewing all soil classifications, it seems cement stabilization would be appropriate for this project. Would KYTC consider cement stabilization? |
Yes, cement stabilization will be required instead of lime stabilization. An addendum will be posted to the website.
| 6/12/2012 9:02 AM |
12-1234 | 104 | Various | Typically, when there are 35Ft-Wooden Poles as a Bid Unit, there is always a call for “ANCHOR GUYS” or “ANCHORS”. Would this bid item be added? |
On page 43, the proposal states, “Incidental to this item shall be furnishing and installing guy wire, anchor and anchor rod, strand vise, and guy guard, if specified.” Some site layouts show an anchor and guy wire and state, “install…anchor, guy wire, and guy guard.” Therefore, no individual bid item will be used for “Anchor.”
| 6/11/2012 11:30 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | What is the depth of the proposed water main? What is the depth of each of the jack & bore crossings? |
The proposed 36-inch water main shall be installed with a minimum 42-inch cover below existing and proposed grade. A minimum 18-inch separation shall be maintained at all locations of sewer, drainage, gas, electric and all other utility conflicts while maintaining the 42-inch cover. Conflicts will require a depth of cover greater than 42-inches. The bore and jack crossings shall be installed at a minimum 42-inch cover including the adjacent ditch lines.
| 6/11/2012 2:22 PM |
12-1234 | 104 | Various | Section 3.9 and 4.6 refer to Install Pad Mount Enclosure but the Figure sheets do not show pad mounted enclosures. If these are used, where are they being used? |
The pad mounted enclosures will not be used on the project. There is not a bid item for this.
| 6/11/2012 2:10 PM |
12-1234 | 104 | Various | Are there any LIQUIDATED DAMAGES on this project? |
Yes. Please see Standard Specification 108.09.
| 6/11/2012 11:30 AM |
12-1234 | 104 | Various | Concerning Items: Signs, Arrow Panel, Portable CMS & Truck Mounted Attenuator, the quantities for these items appear to be set up for working one location at a time. Will the quantities be increased if the contractor feels it is necessary to work multiple locations at the same time in order to meet the completion date? |
Yes, provided that the Contractor shows due diligence in their efforts and the Engineer is in agreement that multiple locations be worked in order to meet the completion date, quantities may be increased to cover the cost of Traffic Control items at the additional sites.
| 6/11/2012 11:30 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Please clarify the identity of the “system provider” and “system supplier” mentioned beginning on page 158 (ITS–19). Specifically, is the Electrical/Signal contractor or the adaptive traffic signal system provider responsible for the adaptive micro-simulation and before-and-after study? |
REVISED Answer:
This item is bid as a single bid item for each intersection that includes all elements stated in the proposal for that intersection. It is not our decision of how any element in the single bid item is provided. The proposal does require that the evaluations and the simulations shall be performed by a prequalified firm according to KYTC.
| 6/12/2012 9:47 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Will LWC be furnishing the pre-stressed concrete transition fittings for connection to existing concrete water mains? |
The contractor shall procure all of their own materials. All materials shall be approved by the Louisville Water Company prior to the placement of any material order.
| 6/11/2012 2:22 PM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | The SPECIAL NOTES FOR UTILITY CLEARANCE indicates that Level 3 will be relocating buried facilities from the edge of the paved shoulder of SB Hurstbourne Pwy and placed under the proposed sidewalk. This work is scheduled to be completed on or before August 20, 2012. This work is in Phase 1 of the project and will impact the work schedule of the roadway widening and relocation of the 36" LWC line. What is the detailed schedule for this relocation work and when can work be completed above the existing facilities and adjacent to the proposed facilities? Will the proposed relocated facilities be completed prior to earthwork operations? If the relocation is not completed prior to the earthwork operations will the widening of the roadway be permitted over the existing buried facilities? |
The 36" waterline relocation is on the same side as the Level 3 relocation and work on these two utilities can be done simultaneously. Level 3 construction will be slated in the first part of July and be completed by August 10 with all splicing and testing to be completed by August 20, 2012.
Until the new Level 3 facilities are placed, earthwork and any other work should not be completed that could interfere with their old facilities.
The existing system has to remain operational until the relocation work is complete.
While work is on-going for the utility relocation on SB KY 1747, the contractor can work on NB KY 1747, ramps on the NB side, and Bluegrass Parkway.
| 6/11/2012 2:25 PM |
12-2954 | 403 | Christian | Can the contractor use Life Rings attached to life lines in lieu of a skiff due to no boat ramp, low summer water levels, and the fact that the stream is not monitored regularly by the Coast Guard, and low height from deck to water level? Also the lack of Navigation Lights on the structure indicates this may not be a navigable waterway. |
No, the contractor cannot use Life Rings attached to live lines in lieu of a skiff. "If the danger of drowning exists", this statement and this alone determines if a skiff is needed in the waterway. See project related information for OSHA interpretation.
| 6/12/2012 9:07 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Will the agency please provide photos of the inside of each traffic cabinet? This will assist with specifying the right components based on cabinet size and space available. |
It is a standard 332 cabinet so the Department will not be providing any photos.
| 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | On pg. 159 (ITS-20), it is stated that “The initial evaluation should include micro-simulation (VISSIM) of the selected system. The micro-simulation should utilize a “hardware-in-the-loop” or similar system.” Does the micro-simulation specified in the RFP include construction of the original VISSIM file in addition to running the simulation and measuring the results? | | 6/12/2012 9:47 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Which intersections are equipped with pedestrian call buttons? |
Please see the signal plans. KY 1747 (Hurstbourne Parkway) & Bluegrass parkway/I-64 EB Off-Ramp (see sheet T39). KY 1747 (Hurstbourne Parkway) & I-64 WB Ramp (see sheet T41). KY 1747 (Hurstbourne Parkway) & Caritas Way (see sheet T42). KY 1747 (Hurstbourne Parkway) & Linn Station Road(see sheet T43)
| 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | What amount of funding is designated for the adaptive portion of this project? |
The information is not available.
| 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Are there any geotechnical reports/soundings for this project? If so, how may bidders obtain them? |
No geotech work was done for this project. Subsurface Utility Exploration/Engineering Quality Level “A” was performed and the results are on Sheets R 2I and R 2J.
| 6/11/2012 2:24 PM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | On pg. 161 (ITS-22), it is stated that “The system shall be compatible with the existing local controller hardware/firmware and the KYTC’s TransPHAT system along with Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government’s Advanced Traffic Management System (CENTRACS). The reconstructed traffic signals will continue to operate with TransPHAT and it is envisioned that this group of signals will eventually be under CENTRACS control and monitoring.” Do the intersections have separate system detectors aside from vehicle detectors so that the CENTRACS system can operate side-by-side and still be able to monitor all operations? | | 6/12/2012 9:47 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Is the agency open to seeing two different product options from the adaptive system provider? If so, how should these two options be presented? |
No, The adaptive system should be a system that runs exclusively off our provided detection in the signal plans.
| 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1324 | 104 | Various | In light of the issue concerning Electrical and Telephone "fees", would the Department consider letting this project at a later date to allow sufficient time to investigate and consult with the individual utility companies involved? |
No, the project has been advertised for 2+ weeks now and will remain in the June 15th letting.
| 6/12/2012 9:52 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | There is a single line item on the bid form (p. 231) for “Adaptive Signal System: Qty: 5.” Please confirm that this unit and combined cost should encompass not only the adaptive system hardware and software, but also deployment services, installation, a third-party micro-simulation and a third-party before-and-after study. | | 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | At which of the five intersections (if any) is Jefferson County currently using or planning to use in the next 12 months emergency vehicle preemption (EVP), transit system priority (TSP), or any other form of preemption or signal priority? | | 6/12/2012 9:47 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | One pg. 164 (ITS – 25), there is a list of documentation deliverables with a request for five hard copies and one electronic copy each. There is also a requirement to provide a comprehensive training plan. Are these deliverables due by June 15, 2012 (bid letting date) or are these due at a later point in time after contractor selection? |
These are due at a later point in time after contractor selection.
| 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Please clarify the identity of the “system provider” and “system supplier” mentioned beginning on page 158 (ITS–19). Specifically, is the prime contractor or the adaptive traffic signal system provider responsible for the adaptive micro-simulation and before-and-after study? |
This item is bid as a single bid item for each intersection that includes all elements stated in the proposal for that intersection. It is not our decision of how any element in the single bid item is provided. The proposal does require that the evaluations and the simulations shall be performed by a prequalified firm according to KYTC.
| 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | At which of the five intersections, if any, is Jefferson County currently using or planning to use in the next 12 months emergency vehicle preemption (EVP), transit system priority (TSP), or any other form of preemption or signal priority? | | 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | For adaptive system performance, it is necessary that at least one wireless in-ground sensor is placed in each lane. Please confirm that this will occur before adaptive system implementation. |
All detection will be provided in the signal plans for each lane. The proposal specifies when adaptive system should be installed.
| 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Is there sufficient capacity in the conduit between the cabinet to the signals for installation of power and Ethernet cabling to provide for one detection camera per approach? |
There should not be any cameras installed because we are using our own detection. If needed, all intersection will be rebuilt and everything shall be new.
| 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | What are the payment terms? |
See Section 109 in the Kentucky Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction
| 6/12/2012 2:38 PM |
12-2600 | 100 | Carroll | Pay Item 0090 02900 Install Temporary Crash Cushion, is not found in the specification book. Going by current specification categorization, shall the contractor use a Type VI BT or Type VI CT? |
Crash Cushion Type VI CT is preferred, however, Type VI BT is also acceptable as long as it meets TL3 requirements.
| 6/12/2012 11:55 AM |
12-2658 | 401 | Various | Pay Items 0340 & 0090 (02900) Install Temporary Crash Cushion, is not found in the specification book. Going by current specification categorization shall the contractor use a Type VI BT or Type VI CT? |
Crash Cushion Type VI CT is preferred, however Type VI BT (must meet TL3) is also acceptable.
| 6/12/2012 12:59 PM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | On pg. 159 (ITS-20), it is stated that “The initial evaluation should include micro-simulation (VISSIM) of the selected system. The micro-simulation should utilize a “hardware-in-the-loop” or similar system.” Does the micro-simulation specified in the RFP include construction of the original VISSIM file in addition to running the simulation and measuring the results? | | 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | In how many instances will there be a cable run greater than 320 feet between the traffic cabinet and a camera at that same intersection? |
There should not be any cameras installed because we are using our own detection. If needed, all intersection will be rebuilt and everything shall be new.
| 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Please describe the criteria that will be evaluated during the Final Acceptance Test of the adaptive traffic control system. |
The Final System Acceptance Test for this project will verify that all of the functionality of the Adaptive Traffic Control System meet the requirements as specified in the bid document (both hardware and software) and the system is successfully operating and working properly and as envisioned.
| 6/12/2012 2:38 PM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | On pg. 161 (ITS-22), it is stated that “The system shall be compatible with the existing local controller hardware/firmware and the KYTC’s TransPHAT system along with Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government’s Advanced Traffic Management System (CENTRACS). The reconstructed traffic signals will continue to operate with TransPHAT and it is envisioned that this group of signals will eventually be under CENTRACS control and monitoring.” Do the intersections have separate system detectors aside from vehicle detectors so that the CENTRACS system can operate side-by-side and still be able to monitor all operations? | | 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1324 | 104 | Various | Is there any way the Department would be able to set up an allowance in the bid form to handle the fees for power and telephone services for this project? |
No, the Department will not be able to do that. However, the requirement for the telephone service has been removed and will not be required. An addendum will be posted to the website.
| 6/12/2012 2:48 PM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | The proposal states that “The system shall provide capability for the operator to establish a manual override function for signal changes or to revert to programmed time-of-day and day-of-week schedules programmed into the local controller.” It also states, “The system should have the ability to run a fixed time of day pattern if necessary.” InSync works by placing detector calls into the controller which is in free mode. The controller recognizes InSync as a detection system. InSync only submits detector calls for up to one pair of concurrently permissible phases. In this way, the controller does exactly what InSync wants it to do. In order for the controller to run its programmed timing plans, it of course must stop running in free mode. The way to remotely command the controller to stop running in free mode and start running its coordination plans is by associating such a command with a configurable 24V pin. What this means is when that 24V pin is actuated, the controller ceases running free and instead runs its programmed plans. Does the existing firmware allow a command like this to be associated with a 24V input/output pin? is there at least one free pin available for this function? | | 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | There is some landscaping along some of the store fronts (ie; Olive Garden, Keller Williams, etc.) that is sure to be damaged by the waterline installation. It may very well be damaged by other trades as well. Where should the replacement of this landscaping be figured? For instance, should that be figured in with the waterline installation or with other portions of this project? |
Replacement of landscaping is part of the ROW phase. The Department pays the owner for landscaping within the construction zone so they can replace it after we are done.
| 6/13/2012 9:04 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | The proposal states that “The system shall provide capability for the operator to establish a manual override function for signal changes or to revert to programmed time-of-day and day-of-week schedules programmed into the local controller.” It also states, “The system should have the ability to run a fixed time of day pattern if necessary.” InSync works by placing detector calls into the controller which is in free mode. The controller recognizes InSync as a detection system. InSync only submits detector calls for up to one pair of concurrently permissible phases. In this way, the controller does exactly what InSync wants it to do. In order for the controller to run its programmed timing plans, it of course must stop running in free mode. The way to remotely command the controller to stop running in free mode and start running its coordination plans is by associating such a command with a configurable 24V pin. What this means is when that 24V pin is actuated, the controller ceases running free and instead runs its programmed plans. is there at least one free pin available for this function? | | 6/12/2012 10:31 AM |
12-1234 | 104 | Various | Does the State supply the Controller Cabinets for Line 0200 Install Controller Cabinet? |
No, the contractor must supply the controller cabinet. Please see page 42 of the proposal.
| 6/14/2012 12:22 PM |
12-2210 | 314 | Graves | Would it be possible to use the State Certified material, Crafco Poly-Fiber Type 3 for this project? |
Yes, that would be acceptable.
| 6/12/2012 11:20 AM |
12-2087 | 311 | Knox | Where the 4’ outside shoulder edge key is placed, what is to be done at entrances, and side roads with respect to both the edgs key and asphalt paving? |
Edge keys and paving for private entrances will be to the back of the 10 foot shoulder. Edge keys and paving for State and County roads will be to the back of the radius.
| 6/14/2012 12:32 PM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | The above referenced bid is out for an Adaptive control system to be installed at 5 new controllers along Hurstbourne Pkwy. The specification requires us to use the 170E controller with WAPITI software. Econolite has an Adaptive module for Centracs that interfaces directly with an ASC3 (NEMA, 2070 or rackmount) controller. The Adaptive module does not interface with WAPITI. Would the Department consider a proposal from PMI and Econolite that would replace the 170 controllers with an ASC3 Rackmount controller or 2070 with ASC3 Software with full adaptive capabilities? | | 6/14/2012 2:27 PM |
12-2600 | 100 | Carroll | Please confirm quantity for Bid Item Line No. 0120 for Eliminate Transverse Joint. |
The quantity is incorrect for Eliminate Transverse Joint. An addendum correcting this will be posted to the website.
| 6/13/2012 2:33 PM |
12-1018 | 310 | Menifee | Can a low water crossing be constructed in the east fork of Indian Creek at the bridge site to transport excavation and move equipment east and west? | | 6/14/2012 2:59 PM |
12-2981 | 308 | Henderson | Please consider extending completion date. Bearing delivery is quoted 12 to 16 weeks. Since this is the only item on the job it will be hard to meet the schedule. |
Contrary to the bid proposal, the completion date will be November 15, 2012.
| 6/14/2012 1:12 PM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Under what bid item will "Maintain Lighting" be paid for? Bid note on plan sheet T44 refers to this but there is no line item for payment. |
There will not be a “Maintain Lighting” bid item. Maintaining the lighting will be incidental to the bid item “Remove Lighting”.
| 6/14/2012 2:58 PM |
12-2600 | 100 | Carroll | How will the expansion joint replacement for piers 1 and 5 be paid (see p. 54 and p. 60)? |
An addendum adding the bid item will be posted to the website.
| 6/13/2012 1:58 PM |
12-2600 | 100 | Carroll | On page 63 in the proposal, the plan dimensions and typical section dimensions do not seem to match. Which are correct? |
An addendum with a corrected page will be posted to the website.
| 6/13/2012 1:58 PM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Please clarify the intent and purpose for bid item “Excavation Unclassified” in the water line section. Is this for rock? |
This item includes all excavation work performed that relates to the waterline relocation work. This includes payment for all materials excavated, including (and not limited) to soil and rock. The quantity for this item includes all sending and receiving pits (for boring and jacking), for all trenchwork and for all other earthwork necessary as part of the waterline installation.
| 6/14/2012 2:27 PM |
12-1018 | 310 | Menifee | Specification allows for fuel adjustment for Embankment In Place. There is not an item established in the bid proposal for fuel adjustment. Will an item be added or will a change order be prepared for fuel adjustment? |
Standard Specification 109.07 will apply. The adjustment bid items will be included by supplemental agreement, if necessary.
| 6/14/2012 3:01 PM |
12-1328 | 305 | Hardin | The 42" storm pipe at sta 147+91 on the pipe sheet pg R-163 shows flowable fill 12'rt to 36' rt this is in the new construction area. Shouldn't the flowable fill be in the limits of the existing pavement? |
Yes. The flowable fill limits were denoted where the pipe is within 1 pipe diameter of the subgrade. In addition to these areas, pipe backfill shall be in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction.
| 6/14/2012 12:20 PM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Along the Keller Williams property (in the existing berm) what should the cover be for that pipe? With no profile it is hard to determine whether or not we’ll have to have extra depth in that area to cover other trades of work. |
If conflicts are encountered, the contractor shall install the proposed water main below the conflict point and maintain a minimum 18-inch of separation under said conflict while maintaining a minimum 42-inch of cover.
| 6/13/2012 9:04 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | Is there a profile available for the waterline? |
A profile for the proposed waterline is currently being completed, and is not available at this time. The completed profile for the proposed waterline will be provided at the preconstruction conference.
| 6/13/2012 9:04 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | The irrigation meter described in item #4 will most likely have to be removed. Will the re-installation of that meter be our responsibility? Is there anywhere in particular it should be relocated? |
The irrigation meter should be treated like any other water meter relocated by the water company. It is normally relocated just outside the ROW line.
| 6/13/2012 9:04 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | There is a bore crossing Linn Station Road. The plans indicate for the bore pit to be on the North side of Linn Station Road. Is there a reason we couldn’t bore from the South side of the road? There seems to be a lot of existing utilities as well as an irrigation meter, etc. that exist on the North side of the road making it harder to bore from that side. Does the Department prefer the contractor to bore from a particular side? |
The contractor may choose the location of the bore and receiving pits and shall verify the locations prior to construction with the KTC and LWC inspectors. Either side may be used as bore and receiving pits based on current site conditions.
| 6/13/2012 9:04 AM |
12-1017 | 203 | Kenton | Item # 00078 Crushed Aggregate # 2 Bid document list 914 tons, plan tabs show 3 tons. Where does the remainder go? |
On item no. 6-362, plan sheet R2D shows 3 Tons of Crushed Agg #2 and, on item no. 6-361, plan sheet R2H shows 911 Tons of Crushed Agg #2 for a proposal total of 914 Tons.
| 6/13/2012 11:51 AM |
12-1329 | 105 | Jefferson | There are no bid items for seed/straw or asphalt / concrete replacement within the waterline section of the bid items. Is it ok to assume that all seed/straw (landscaping included) as well as asphalt and concrete pavement replacement is included within the other bid items that the general highway contractors will bid? |
All grading, erosion control and seeding/restoration work is to be completed in accordance with the current edition of the Department’s Standard Specifications. Similarly this work is to be paid for (or incidental) in accordance with the current edition of the Department’s Standard Specifications.
| 6/13/2012 9:04 AM |
12-1017 | 203 | | Item no. 6-362.00 sheet R2D note #1 states the removal of the temporary pavement is incidental to roadway excavation. How is the prep for the temporary pavement paid for? There is no diversion item. |
All “prep” work is covered under the bid item for earthwork. The temporary widening did not extend out past the ultimate construction limit.
| 6/13/2012 11:51 AM |